Class 9 civics Chapter 1 – what is democracy


Class 9 civics Chapter 1 – what is democracy? why democracy?
Step into the world of democracy — the most powerful idea that continues to shape nations, challenge dictatorships, and empower people. These NCERT-based Class 9 notes on What is Democracy? Why Democracy? walk you through the core principles of democratic government, real-life examples from around the globe, and the deeper meanings behind why democracy matters in our lives.
From elections in Pakistan to military rule in Myanmar, and from Zimbabwe’s struggles to India’s proud democratic foundation — discover how systems of government differ, and what truly defines a real democracy.
🗳️ Perfect for last-minute revision, concept clarity, and exam preparation, this one-stop resource uses detailed flowcharts, key terms, and structured explanations to make democracy easy to understand and hard to forget.
Class 9 Civics Chapter 1 – What is Democracy? Why Democracy?
1.1 What is Democracy?
Why Do We Need to Define Democracy?
- The term democracy is used differently by different governments.
- Many countries claim to be democratic, but their systems do not follow real democratic principles.
- To separate true democracies from fake ones, we need a clear and proper definition.
- A definition helps us judge whether a government truly represents the people or just uses the name “democracy”.
Famous Definition by Abraham Lincoln
“Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
- This definition expresses the core idea of democracy.
- It shows that the people are both the source of power and the beneficiaries of government decisions.
Simple Definition of Democracy
- A useful and practical definition is:
“Democracy is a form of government in which the rulers are elected by the people.” - This helps distinguish democratic governments from clearly non-democratic ones.
Examples to Understand the Simple Definition
- Democratic Governments: Rulers are elected through regular, free, and fair elections.
- Non-Democratic Governments:
- Myanmar (Military Rule): Army took control without elections.
- Chile under Pinochet (Dictatorship): Ruler was not elected by the people.
- Saudi Arabia (Monarchy): King comes to power by birth, not elections.
Limitation of the Simple Definition
- This basic definition only mentions elections.
- But some governments hold elections without giving real choice — they are not truly democratic.
- Today, many governments call themselves democratic without following democratic principles.
- So, we must look beyond just elections to understand what makes a real democracy.
- This will be discussed in more detail in the next sections.
1. Democracy: A system of government in which the rulers are elected by the people.
2. Dictatorship: Rule where leaders are not elected and citizens cannot remove them.
3. Monarchy: Government where power is inherited, not chosen by people.
4. Abraham Lincoln’s Definition: “Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
1.2 Features of Democracy
Introduction: Why We Need to Identify the Features
- We began with a basic definition: Democracy is a form of government in which rulers are elected by the people.
- However, this definition raises several important questions:
- Who are considered the rulers?
- What makes an election truly democratic?
- Who is allowed to vote and stand for elections?
- Are there any limits on the powers of elected leaders?
- To answer these, we must understand the key features that make a government democratic.
Feature 1: Major Decisions Must Be Taken by Elected Leaders
- In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf seized power through a military coup in October 1999, overthrowing a democratically elected government.
- He declared himself the ‘Chief Executive’, later changed his title to President, and held a referendum in 2002 to extend his rule by five more years.
- This referendum was widely criticised by the media, human rights groups, and pro-democracy activists for being full of malpractices and fraud.
- In August 2002, Musharraf passed a Legal Framework Order, amending Pakistan’s Constitution:
- It gave the President the power to dismiss national and provincial assemblies.
- It gave military officers dominance in the National Security Council, which supervised the civilian cabinet.
- Although elections were held for the national and provincial assemblies, and elected representatives had some powers, the final decision-making authority remained with General Musharraf and military officers, who were not elected by the people.
- This kind of arrangement exists in many dictatorships and monarchies:
- They may have elected parliaments, but real power lies with non-elected authorities.
- In some countries, real power is even held by external forces, not by locally elected leaders.
- Such a system cannot be called people’s rule, because elected representatives do not have the final say.
1. Military Coup: A sudden and unlawful seizure of government power by the military.
2. Chief Executive: A title used by General Musharraf after overthrowing the elected government, before becoming President.
3. Referendum: A direct vote in which people are asked to accept or reject a particular proposal or leader.
4. Legal Framework Order: A law passed by General Musharraf that changed the Constitution of Pakistan to expand presidential powers.
5. National Security Council: A government body controlled by military officers in Pakistan, used to supervise the elected cabinet.
6. Dictatorship: A form of government where power lies with one person or a small group not elected by the people.
7. Elected Representatives: Leaders chosen by the public through regular, free, and fair elections.
Feature 2: Free and Fair Electoral Competition
- In China, elections are held every five years to elect members of the National People’s Congress (Quanguo Renmin Daibiao Dahui) — the national Parliament.
- The National People’s Congress has the authority to appoint the President of the country.
- It has nearly 3,000 members elected from across the country, including some elected by the army.
- However, only candidates approved by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or its eight allied parties were allowed to contest the 2002–03 elections.
- This means the government is always formed by the Communist Party, and voters do not have a real choice between political alternatives.
- In Mexico, since its independence in 1930, elections have been held every six years to elect the President.
- The country was never ruled by the military or a dictator.
- However, until the year 2000, every election was won by a single party: the PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party).
- Although opposition parties did contest, they never won due to several undemocratic practices:
- Government employees were forced to attend PRI meetings.
- Teachers in government schools pressured parents to vote for PRI.
- The media ignored opposition parties and only promoted the ruling party.
- Polling booths were shifted last minute to reduce voting.
- The PRI spent large amounts of money in campaigning, gaining unfair advantage.
- In China, people have no real choice, as all candidates must be approved by the ruling party.
- In Mexico, although people seemed to have a choice, in reality, the system was heavily manipulated to ensure PRI's victory.
- These elections do not meet the standard of fairness and competition.
1. National People’s Congress: The Parliament of China with the power to appoint the President.
2. Chinese Communist Party (CCP): The ruling party in China that approves all election candidates.
3. Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI): A dominant political party in Mexico until 2000, known for manipulating elections.
4. Free and Fair Elections: A democratic process where all political parties have an equal chance to contest and win.
5. Electoral Manipulation: Unfair or undemocratic tactics used to influence election results, such as biased media or forced voting.
Feature 3: One Person, One Vote, One Value
- In earlier chapters, we read how the struggle for democracy in different countries was closely linked to the demand for universal adult franchise.
- This principle means that every adult citizen, regardless of caste, class, religion, gender, or ethnicity, must have the right to vote.
- Today, the idea of political equality — where each person’s vote has equal value — is widely accepted as a core principle of democracy.
- However, in practice, there are still many instances across the world where this principle is violated.
- Saudi Arabia:
- Until 2015, women in Saudi Arabia were not allowed to vote.
- This denied political equality to half the population.
- Estonia:
- Citizenship laws have been framed in such a way that people from the Russian minority find it difficult to get voting rights.
- This means certain ethnic groups are excluded from democratic participation.
- Fiji:
- The electoral system was designed in a way that gave more value to the vote of an indigenous Fijian than to that of an Indian-Fijian.
- This violates the principle that each vote should carry equal weight.
1. Universal Adult Franchise: The right of every adult citizen to vote, regardless of gender, race, class, or background.
2. Political Equality: A democratic principle where all individuals have equal political rights, especially in voting.
3. Russian Minority in Estonia: A group facing difficulties in gaining full voting rights due to restrictive citizenship laws.
4. Indian-Fijian: Citizens of Indian origin in Fiji who have historically been disadvantaged in the electoral process.
5. Electoral Discrimination: Any system where votes are not treated equally or access to voting is unfairly restricted.
Feature 4: Rule of Law and Respect for Rights
- Zimbabwe became independent in 1980, ending white minority rule.
- Since then, the country was ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle.
- Its leader, Robert Mugabe, remained in power from 1980 until 2017.
- Although elections were held regularly, ZANU-PF always won, but used unfair means:
- The Constitution was amended multiple times to increase the powers of the President and reduce accountability.
- Opposition party workers were harassed, and their meetings were disrupted.
- Public protests and demonstrations were declared illegal.
- A law was passed that limited citizens’ right to criticise the President.
- Television and radio were controlled by the government, showing only ZANU-PF’s viewpoint.
- Independent newspapers existed, but journalists were harassed if they criticised the government.
- The government ignored court judgments and pressurised judges to act in its favour.
- Mugabe remained in power until he was forced out of office in 2017.
- Zimbabwe shows that popular approval or winning elections is not enough for a country to be called a democracy.
- A popular government can still be undemocratic or autocratic.
- To truly assess democracy, one must look at what happens:
- Before elections – Is there freedom for opposition and political activities?
- After elections – Are citizens’ rights respected and is the government accountable?
- Citizens must have the freedom to think, form opinions, and express them publicly.
- They should have the right to form associations, organise protests, and participate in political action.
- All people must be equal before the law.
- These basic rights must be protected by an independent judiciary, whose orders are obeyed by everyone.
- After elections, the government cannot act without limits. It must:
- Follow constitutional rules.
- Respect guarantees to minorities.
- Take decisions through consultation processes.
- Ensure that office bearers act according to constitutional rights and responsibilities.
- Be accountable not just to the people but also to other independent bodies.
1. ZANU-PF: Ruling party in Zimbabwe since 1980, led by Robert Mugabe.
2. Political Rights: Rights that allow citizens to participate freely in political activities like forming opinions, protests, and associations.
3. Independent Judiciary: A judiciary that can function without pressure or interference from the government.
4. Constitutional Limits: Legal and institutional rules that a democratic government must follow.
5. Minority Rights: Special protections that prevent the majority from misusing power against smaller or weaker groups.
Four Features of Democracy
A democracy is not just about elections — it is a system of government that follows certain essential principles. Based on the discussion and examples in this section, we understand democracy as a form of government in which:
- Rulers elected by the people take all the major decisions
→ In a democracy, the final decision-making power must rest with leaders who are elected by the citizens, not with military officials or hereditary rulers. - Elections offer a choice and fair opportunity to the people to change the current rulers
→ A democracy must conduct free and fair elections, where people can freely choose among different political alternatives. - This choice and opportunity is available to all the people on an equal basis
→ Every adult citizen must have the right to vote, and every vote must carry equal value, without discrimination. - The exercise of this choice leads to a government limited by basic rules of the constitution and citizens’ rights
→ A democratic government must respect the Constitution, follow the law, and protect the fundamental rights of all citizens, including minorities.
🔴 1.3 WHY DEMOCRACY?
🔻 Arguments Against Democracy
- Democracy leads to instability
In a democracy, leaders keep changing frequently through elections.
This constant change can create instability, as long-term policies may get interrupted or reversed with every change in leadership. - Democracy encourages political competition, not morality
Democracy often becomes a game of political rivalry and power struggle.
Parties and leaders are sometimes more focused on winning elections than on maintaining ethical standards or making moral choices. - Democracy causes delays in decision-making
Since a democracy involves consultation with many people, including elected representatives, opposition parties, and interest groups, the process becomes slow.
Quick decisions are difficult, especially in emergencies or when urgent reforms are needed. - Democratic leaders may not always know what is best for the people
Elected representatives might lack proper understanding, technical knowledge, or long-term vision.
Their decisions may not always reflect the best interest of the nation, especially if taken under public pressure or political influence. - Democracy encourages corruption
Electoral competition often leads to unethical practices, such as vote-buying, bribery, and misuse of power.
Candidates may spend large amounts of money during campaigns, increasing chances of corruption once in office. - Ordinary people are not always wise enough to decide
Some critics argue that ordinary citizens lack education, awareness, or experience to make sound political decisions.
This can lead to wrong choices, as people may vote based on emotion, caste, religion, or false promises.
- Democracy is not a magical solution for all the problems of a country.
- It has not ended poverty in India or elsewhere.
- People may make mistakes, and wrong decisions can be taken even in democratic systems.
- Delays, leadership changes, and inefficiencies are real concerns.
- However, these flaws do not mean democracy is not valuable — we shall explore its positive aspects in the next section.
1. Instability: Frequent changes in leadership or policies, often disrupting governance.
2. Political Competition: Struggle among parties and leaders to gain power through elections.
3. Corruption: Unethical or illegal behaviour, especially involving misuse of public power.
4. Delay in Decision-making: Slowness in governance due to need for consultation and approval.
✅ Arguments in Favour of Democracy
-
Democracy ensures accountability to the people
- Example: The famine in China (1958–1961) caused the death of nearly three crore people. At the same time, India, though economically weaker, avoided such a large-scale crisis.
- Why? India’s democratic structure forced its leaders to respond to food scarcity. Free press, public criticism, and opposition pressure made it necessary for the government to act.
- Conclusion: In democracy, rulers are accountable to the people. They must respond to the people’s needs. A non-democratic government may or may not do so — it depends solely on the will of the ruler.
📌 Key Point: A democratic government is more accountable to its citizens than any other form of government. -
Democracy improves the quality of decision-making
- In democracy, decisions are taken through consultation and discussion.
- A democratic decision involves multiple perspectives, debates, and reviews, which help avoid major errors.
- Though slow, this process helps prevent rash or harmful decisions.
📌 Key Point: Involving many people in decision-making leads to wiser and more thoughtful governance. -
Democracy provides a peaceful way to resolve conflicts
- In every society, people have different views, religions, castes, regions, and languages.
- These differences can lead to serious conflicts.
- In non-democratic systems, the stronger group dominates, creating resentment and unrest.
- Democracy, on the other hand, offers a peaceful platform for conflict resolution.
📌 Key Point: Democracy ensures that no group is permanently defeated, and all can coexist peacefully through compromise and negotiation. -
Democracy enhances the dignity of citizens
- In democracy, everyone is treated as politically equal, regardless of wealth, caste, gender, or education.
- Even the poorest person has the same vote and voice as the richest.
- People are not ruled as subjects, but instead are active participants in governance.
- Even if people make wrong choices, they are responsible for their decisions, which makes them mature and dignified citizens.
📌 Key Point: Democracy gives citizens a sense of self-respect and control over their own lives. -
Democracy allows us to correct our own mistakes
- Mistakes happen in all governments, but in a democracy:
- Mistakes are openly discussed,
- Rulers can be questioned,
- Decisions can be changed, or
- Rulers can be removed through elections.
- Non-democratic governments suppress dissent and hide their failures.
📌 Key Point: Democracy creates space for correction, reform, and change — it is a self-improving system.
- Democracy may not solve every problem instantly, but it is far better than any other form of government we know.
- It gives more dignity, more freedom, more accountability, and a peaceful space for diverse people to live together.
- Even when democracy fails, it provides a peaceful way to correct itself.
1. Accountable Government: A system where leaders are answerable to the people and must justify actions.
2. Consultation: The process of taking advice and opinions from multiple people before deciding.
3. Political Equality: Equal rights and voting power for every adult citizen.
4. Conflict Resolution: Peaceful settlement of disagreements between individuals or groups.
5. Self-Correction: The ability of a system to recognise and fix its own mistakes.
✅ 1.4 Broader Meanings of Democracy
➤ Democracy: A Minimal Understanding
- So far, we have studied democracy as a form of government. This helps us identify the basic, minimal features that any country must have to be called a democracy:
- Rulers elected by the people;
- Free and fair elections;
- Equal voting rights;
- Rule of law and citizen rights.
- In modern times, this form is usually a representative democracy — where people elect their leaders to make decisions on their behalf.
- Why representative democracy?
- Modern democracies have large populations, so it is physically impossible for all people to gather and make decisions directly.
- Most people do not have the time, resources, or skills to participate in every decision.
- So, people rule indirectly through elected representatives.
➤ Moving Beyond: A Broader Understanding of Democracy
- While the minimal definition helps us differentiate democracies from non-democracies, it does not help us understand the quality of a democracy.
- We must also look at democracy as:
- A method of decision-making
- An ideal to strive for
- A principle that can apply to all areas of life, not just government
1. Democracy as a method of decision-making
- Sometimes, people use the word "democracy" in their personal or social lives:
- “Our family is democratic — we discuss decisions together.”
- “My teacher allows students to speak — she has a democratic nature.”
- “This party is undemocratic — only one leader decides everything.”
- In such cases, democracy means shared decision-making, where:
- Everyone affected by the decision has an equal say.
- Power is not concentrated with one person or a few.
- 🔁 This meaning of democracy applies to families, classrooms, clubs, offices, and other groups — not just governments.
2. Democracy as an ideal
- Sometimes people refer to democracy not just as a system, but as an ideal standard that existing democracies must strive toward:
- “True democracy will exist only when no one sleeps hungry.”
- “Democracy means not just voting rights, but also equal education, resources, and opportunities.”
- This idea highlights that:
- No country is a perfect democracy.
- Democracy is a journey, not a fixed achievement.
- It is not enough to just have elections; quality of life and participation also matter.
- 👉 This helps us judge and improve the functioning of real democracies.
3. Democracy beyond government: In every sphere of life
- Any community or institution — a village, school, office, or political party — can be democratic if it follows:
- Consultation with all members
- Equality in decision-making
- Respect for everyone’s opinion
- 🔸 Example: A Gram Sabha in a village, where everyone gathers and votes on local issues, is a form of direct democracy.
➤ Democracy Is Not Perfect — But It’s Participatory
- No democracy is perfect.
- The features discussed in this chapter are minimum conditions, not ideals.
- A good democracy requires continuous improvement.
- Most importantly, citizens have the power to shape their democracy:
- ✅ The fate of a democracy depends not just on what the government does, but on what citizens do.
- In a democracy:
- Citizens must actively participate.
- Citizens have a duty to question, engage, and demand improvement.
- This is the true strength — and also the challenge — of democracy.
1. Representative Democracy: A system where people elect leaders to make decisions on their behalf.
2. Democratic Ideal: A goal or vision where equality, justice, and participation are fully achieved.
3. Decision-making Method: A way of reaching a decision that involves equal consultation.
4. Direct Democracy: A form of democracy where people participate directly in decision-making.
5. Active Citizenship: When citizens engage regularly with public affairs to improve governance.